Yeah it's horrible. For it to somehow be worth watching with ads, the ads had to be for a legitimate and relevant product, and the algorithm / video quality had to be much better.
Yeah it's horrible. For it to somehow be worth watching with ads, the ads had to be for a legitimate and relevant product, and the algorithm / video quality had to be much better.
The ads are just extremely bad in general. Betting ads for a legitimate casino would already be a huge step up form the shit I get…
If it was generally safe, maybe yes. E.g. could they get me out of there quick enough if I had some medical emergency?
I guess that also makes it somewhat easier to get hired though? You can give your employees a chance without thinking too much about it, and if they suck just fire them.
Yeah but most people never use it, or put other Stuff in it.
ID card? But what about non-white people? /s
PANTONE 14-0105 TPG
Also be careful, because some solvents in the paints could melt the plastic. So test it first on a small part on the inside or so.
I think we are actually saying the same thing though…? Tests should really only ensure functionality. It should be the language’s job to help you with obvious implementation errors (such as using a wrong value type).
My point was that without a type system you need an impossible 100% code coverage, to be sure that you didn’t accidentally mess up some variable assignment or parameter somewhere, since you have nothings to easily and automatically catch those errors.
A quick check everytime when you build / package the code is surely more effective than a human code review.
Also the difficulty of coding in a language where there isn’t any static type analysis still remains. How does it even work, do you have to do a manual text search everytime you change some existing function or class?
The trivial problem here being knowing what kinda of parameter some random function somewhere in your code expects… And your code not randomly breaking in production when someone changes that function after you already used it, unless you wrote unit tests that literally test every single line of code.
Dass man nicht ungefragt erregt werden möchte, oder dass man Brüste sexuell erregend findet?
I mean, if you are a designer that needs it but doesn’t know how to download and crack stuff, 12$ might be worth that time.
und warum?
Weil andere Menschen im Schwimmbad vielleicht nicht unbedingt sexuell erregt werden möchten?
Ich verstehe diesen Artikel nicht. Es werden wildeste Dinge aufgezählt aber nicht erklärt wie diese Daten gesammelt werden.
Wie soll das Auto z.B. meine genetischen Daten sammeln, und an wen werden die geschickt? Die meisten Autos haben ja nichtmal einen Internetzugang.
So it has perceived value…
But that guy above was saying that it’s worthless and trivial to implement…
You can’t have it both ways.
But DLSS is an Nvidia DLL, you’re not even licensed to redistribute it - and you’re not doing anything special, you’re hooking into the data the engine spews out for FSR.
If it’s not anything special, someone else could just “easily” reproduce it instead of having to pirate it?
But what exactly is a model? Can I download and run it? Do I need to access it through their API? Do I need to pay for some server that has all the needed software already running on it? It seems open and not open at the same time.
Am I the only one that really hates huggingface? It’s such a confusing website to use, and most of the time the things just spit out errors. And I’m never sure if this is just a free thing, or a demo, or something that I have to pay.
Like what is the proper way to use that thing?!
You get ads for actually real products? Literally the only ad for a real thing that is available to me was about a cleaning company for house fassades… but I don't have a house. Everything else is stupid games or apps, or porn or straight up scams.