I also added the source there :)

Source: Slack Wyrm 050

RSS Feed: http://www.joshuawright.net/rss_joshuawright.xml

Clean version image (no JPEG-ed)

Source: Frosty : comics

RSS Feed for u/dogmodog submissions to r/comics:
https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/search/?q=author:"dogmodog"&include_over_18=on&restrict_sr=on&t=all&sort=new

[email protected]

How long would you say it took you before getting a fundamental understanding?

I would say years, as with any complex activity.

I’m still forgetting things I learned 3 or even 4 times like how to do a for each loop.

You can forget in 2 different ways:

1. Forget how to use something, so you need to look how to do it.
2. Forget that something exists, so you cannot even look for it because you are not aware it’s a possibility.

You will forget-1 everything which you don’t use on a daily basis. That’s what internet is for. Forgetting in the 2-nd sense is much more rare and you should do something if that’s the case.

all of it feels too advanced and I get lost on how to begin

This is a bias most of us have, you overlook how easy is for you to do things that previously were impossible and focus on how hard are the things you still don’t know how to do. And computing is so complex right now that there always be “infinite” things you don’t know.

Try showing what you know to someone who doesn’t know how to code and you will get an idea of how much you have learnt :).

Anyway, I don’t really have good advice :/, just wanted to confirm that what you feel is expected. Good luck!

I think you’re confusing “arbitrarily large” with “infinitely large”. See Wikipedia Arbitrarily large vs. (…) infinitely large

Furthermore, “arbitrarily large” also does not mean “infinitely large”. For example, although prime numbers can be arbitrarily large, an infinitely large prime number does not exist—since all prime numbers (as well as all other integers) are finite.

For integers I disagree (but I’m not a mathematician). The set of integers with infinite digits is the empty set, so AFAIK, it has probability 0.

Doesn’t it depends on whether we are talking about real or integer numbers?

EDIT: I think it also works with p-adic numbers.

I also think that’s correct… if we are talking about real numbers.

People are probably thinking about integers. I’m not sure about OP.

EDIT: I think it also works with p-adic numbers.

From a similar post:

I suggest Rhizoverse, based on Deleuze’s and Guattari’s Rhizome philosophical concept.

But it’s probably too pretentious :)

Credit: Hisa
Source:

• Twitter - Hisa (@Hisa0808): “大寒波後の日本海海岸がもはや海外。”
• Nitter link
• Nitter RSS Feed: https://nitter.cz/Hisa0808/media/rss

Source: xkcd: Old Game Worlds

Hover text:

Ok, how many coins for a cinnamon roll?

there are just bout four preset layouts of the cards.

It's 8 different layouts, but yes, they are only a few of them. The funny thing is that they are not hardcoded, but the result of a buggy implementation of an algorithm that could have generated millions of different layouts. The specific assembly code is explained line by line on the video.

Credit: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - 2006-12-14

RSS Feed: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/rss

Very [email protected]!

Already answered in other comments. I just wanted to add a couple of related communities:

• [email protected]
• [email protected]

You are correct in thinking it’s NSFW, from Scat - Wikipedia, whith many other meanings, but the one you are looking for is probably this one:

Scat is an alternate term for feces, particularly of wild carnivores

• Scatophilia, a sexual paraphilia involving feces

A couple of examples from the comments of another post:

Source of the image: Retro 19 – Abu Simbel, Profanation | Commodore Spain

Source of the image: El confidencial