• Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t get the premise of posts like that. We scold Google and other corps for not following the laws they are supposed to follow (data protection for example).and then we scold them for daring to follow lawmakers, when we don’t like the laws they follow. Which is it?

    • Jayjader@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the point is to scold Google for the harm they cause or fail to prevent. When the law is written so as to genuinely prevent harm (data protection, for ex) then I will scold those who don’t follow it. When the law is written so as to be ineffective at best and harmful at worst, I will scold those who do follow it.

      The point isn’t to be consistent with regards to the law, as the law itself is not always either consistent nor “good”.

      … unless it is me that isn’t understanding your own comment?

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        So we want Google and such to ignore laws when we think they should be ignored? Who decides which is which then?

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Human Rights are higher than any law. Just because its law in China, does not mean it is correct to follow the law. It is not we decide which laws to follow, but it is universally in entire world the right thing to support Human Rights, regardless of any law.