Does anyone really need 7000 nuclear warheads?
Well if you want to blow up all your enemies at once, yeah.
Well, we needed more than the other guys and they felt the same way.
Exactly what I asked your mom.
She’s got three as dildos and two of them are of same size. Fucking hoarders smh.
The US had several tens of thousands in its heyday.
Don’t worry, they’re just deterrents.
Until someone with the button thinks they can win.
Still, I do worry.
The Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion (JEFF) Nuclear Data Library is a collaboration between NEA Data Bank participating countries. The JEFF library combines the efforts of its different Working Groups to produce sets of evaluated nuclear data, for fission and fusion applications.
https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_27365/the-jeff-nuclear-data-library
Sounds like something Jeff would say
Based acronym
My name jeff
And do you have less than 10 nuclear warheads?
Yes
Your username as two, wait three names in it, and none are jeff. I am confused, flabbergasted and quite possibly bamboozled.
Why do you need nuclear arsenals, Jeff??? Hmm???
My partner just said Bezos and its a terrifying symbol of what this world has become that that’s even a possibility. He’s like a real life Lex Luthor.
Oh, I thought “Jeff” was a joke, lol
It’s real but not bezos
Jeff!? As in Jeff!?!?
Real advice: leave Jeff alone.
After seeing Russia’s non-nuclear weapons, I honestly don’t believe they have that many nuclear weapons.
I’m not saying they have none, but I don’t think they’ve kept up the maintenance required for 7,000.
Same goes for the US. Most launch facilities are in subpar condition.
I think that “subpar” are slightly different to US and Russia though.
Yup. It’s actually fascinating to read up on how the US maintains and tests nuclear weapons.
Mos likely a lot of them are really old and not ik workikg conditions but they like to keep up the illusion that they could just nuke the whole globe
I mean, the actual number they have is irrelevant because there’s no way of knowing which ones are duds until it’s too late. If they were to launch a nuclear attack, the countries they’re attacking wouldn’t wait to see if it was a dud before responding. Because even if there’s only a 10% chance it detonates, that’s still 700 nukes detonating.
Wow ordered list in descending order. 100-120 is somehow higher in the list than 110-130
I get the feeling this isn’t real, some how
I don’t get what the deal is, I also have less than 10 nuclear warheads
Bush: “Iraq has less than 10 WMD’s, we gotta invade!”
CIA joins the call
Fewer.
Grammar is still important even if you’re in possession of WMD.
