Man Found Guilty of Child Porn, Because He Ran a Tor Exit Node::undefined

  • wackster_fapster@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    CP laws (in the US and probably other places) fall under a doctrine called strict liability, which basically means that you’re guilty regardless of intent or even knowledge of an offense.

    It’s fucked.

    • BadRS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t a crime worse than hurting children. Does that mean we should allow law enforcement infinity leeway to punish these crimes and persue the offenders? I hate to ever give law enforcement any leeway as abuse is so common, but if someone is hurting children I don’t care how you stop it.

      Is hosting a tor exit nods with the knowledge that doing so might help pedophiles hurting children? That feels like too many layers to me. Too esoteric.

      • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hate to ever give law enforcement any leeway as abuse is so common, but if someone is hurting children I don’t care how you stop it.

        Is this satire? Because that’s exactly the excuse government has been giving for hundreds of years, to take your freedoms away.

        It’s never about the children. The Catholic church operating with near total immunity, after all these millennia of abuse, is proof of that.

        • BadRS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right and I agree completely. My ACAB hat slips when they bring up kinds. Which is, of course, their intent.