It had been in the works for a while, but now it has formally been adopted. From the article:

The regulation provides that by 2027 portable batteries incorporated into appliances should be removable and replaceable by the end-user, leaving sufficient time for operators to adapt the design of their products to this requirement.

  • MumboAttribute7322@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The market has spoken. If there were enough normies who would want bulky phones with removable batteries they would buy them. But they don’t… They want shinny unibody phones with locked bootloaders and proprietary connectors. Only a small minority cares about these issues.

    • givingitago@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t tell if sarcasm… Can you even buy a decent phone with a removable battery? It’s effectively not an option right now

      • MumboAttribute7322@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why would they incur the cost of retrofitting their factories or production process for a small minority that wants removable batteries. If there was enough demand they’d know because they’d market it as a feature and profit from it. Truth is normies don’t care or prefer the look/feel of soldered batteries and unibody slim phones. I’d personally like all phones to have an unlocked bootloader but I know that’s not what the market wants and manufacturers rarely offer it. I can’t force them to make one for me so I just ignore them and buy the one with an unlocked bootloader.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          My entire family would prefer removable batteries.

          It is not a case of consumers choosing one or the other. It is a choice that was taken away because new phones are more profitable than new batteries.

          And while even I will say “Yes, I prefer how sleek unibody phones look.”, that acknowledgement is not equivalent to saying “I prefer owning a unibody over a phone with replaceable batteries and other parts.” or “I’d rather buy a unibody.”

          Only reason I use a unibody is because I am unable to get a used smartphone with replaceable batteries for ~$300 at all, nevermind a decent one.

        • givingitago@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t make them with removable batteries because now when your battery dies, the phone is useless. So you have to buy a new one. Phone sales would dry up. We should be moving to a production model of sustainability and durability. Phones and electronics can be made to run indefinitely. The battery is really the only exhaustible part. Replace that when it dies, then the life rest of the electronics is extended. This is the most efficient model, resource and energy-wise.

    • Thadrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really hope the consequences of that decision won’t be too noticeable. Granted, there aren’t great options for people that want removable batteries, but this is taking away consumer choice, just in the opposite direction.

      • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you don’t want to change your battery that’s your thing. It just gives you the option to, so I don’t see what option it’s taking

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every phone is a compromise, size, weight, how much space you use for battery, how much for ports, how much for easy accessibility. As I understand it, I won’t be able to get one that sacrifices easy accessibility for the other stuff. I just hope the compromises won’t be too bad.

          • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think they will be big compromises. I mean they use batteries anyways, so the ability to change them easily won’t be that big of a deal. They managed to do that in the past and just decided that it’s more profitable to glue them in

            • Thadrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I hope so, but a sturdier packaging for the battery with a solid connector, space for a bunch of screws, reusable gasket instead of just glue etc. all takes some space.