• PlatipusRex@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Best reply thus far to this flamebait post!

    Every new movie in this fucked up “trilogy” was really just shitting on the last movie.

    So one may shit (legitimately) on the third movie (I don’t even remember the title, lol), but they won’t admit that it’s partly because Galaxy Brain Johnson ended his pretentious movie with ZERO interesting story to tell, having killed both the arch-nemesis and Luke… among so many other appealing characters. This could have just ended there, as a two-parts Star Wars saga with a crappy storyline involving some Galactic Empire 2.0 and its Supreme Leader we’re told nothing about.

    • Sunforged@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was one man who carried the sequels hard. One man that no matter what shit the sequels threw at him he turned to gold. Yet here you are implying he couldn’t have been the central antagonist for the last movie?!

      Also so what Luke died in some epic space wizardry?! Force ghosts meant he could have played just as big a part in the final act. That’s not the detriment you claim it to be.