And this is exactly what s/he’s talking about. The whole name calling thing if someone has a differing viewpoint. It’s militant and intolerant. I’m just so sick of this kind of attitude here, I’m close to ditching Lemmy because of it.
Lol are you incapable of understanding subtext or are you intentionally pretending like the other commenter isn’t cryptically expressing “intolerant” views?
I couldn’t care less about tolerating “opinions” that accept/support inequality.
They’re probably a “centrist” – comfortable with the status quo and sympathetic to right wing politics – and they’re likely rich or wish they were rich.
They paint leftists as selfish incompetents whose problems with the current system boil down to an inability to buy their own house. That’s an incredibly privileged, unempathetic and ignorant view of left-wing politics.
I’d bet that this commenter looks at everything through a “humans are inherently selfish” worldview, plus an apathetic acceptance of (socioeconomic) inequality.
And this is exactly what s/he’s talking about. The whole name calling thing if someone has a differing viewpoint. It’s militant and intolerant. I’m just so sick of this kind of attitude here, I’m close to ditching Lemmy because of it.
Lol are you incapable of understanding subtext or are you intentionally pretending like the other commenter isn’t cryptically expressing “intolerant” views?
I couldn’t care less about tolerating “opinions” that accept/support inequality.
They’re probably a “centrist” – comfortable with the status quo and sympathetic to right wing politics – and they’re likely rich or wish they were rich.
They paint leftists as selfish incompetents whose problems with the current system boil down to an inability to buy their own house. That’s an incredibly privileged, unempathetic and ignorant view of left-wing politics.
I’d bet that this commenter looks at everything through a “humans are inherently selfish” worldview, plus an apathetic acceptance of (socioeconomic) inequality.