dope@lemm.ee to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhich political model best manages Lemmy threads : Autocratic, Democratic, Anarchic...?message-squaremessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down112
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareWhich political model best manages Lemmy threads : Autocratic, Democratic, Anarchic...?dope@lemm.ee to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squaredope@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThat means no moderators. I’m ok with that. That might require “blocking” (extreme voting?). Which would be the equivalent of little bits of the democratic union freely seceding?
minus-squareominouslemon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoModerators would be the government. A user blocking another one would be a restrictive order. An instance blocking another one would be a cold war. Voting is voting
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year ago Moderators would be the government A democratic government must listen to the people. A mod listens only to his own belly and maybe to the rules that he himself has set up (until the instance admin cancels him).
That means no moderators. I’m ok with that.
That might require “blocking” (extreme voting?). Which would be the equivalent of little bits of the democratic union freely seceding?
Moderators would be the government. A user blocking another one would be a restrictive order. An instance blocking another one would be a cold war. Voting is voting
A democratic government must listen to the people.
A mod listens only to his own belly and maybe to the rules that he himself has set up (until the instance admin cancels him).