Here’s a list of the best wireless headphones you can buy right now, as reviewed by Engadget editors…

  • costa@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always go to rtings if I wanna buy something. They make such detailed reviews!

      • Weaselmaster@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They should focus on electric cars. Replacing tiny batteries in thin phones or thinner headphones is silly to legislate compared to gigantic batteries in big cars. The rest of the car could easily have a 20 year life with no internal combustion engine, but most get scrapped after 6-8 years.

        If they want to pretend that they’re saving the planet with legislation, go for the real volume.

        User replaceable batteries in earbuds would make them thicker and heavier - exactly what consumers say they don’t want.

        • moonw0man@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Electric Cars have replaceable batteries? No one’s throwing away that much money in precious metals. Recycling companies are spinning up to handle EV batteries as they start to fail, which they haven’t in large numbers yet.

    • Hammy@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been rocking my Sony WH-1000XM3’s for going on 5 years now and have had absolutely zero issues with battery life (or anything else for that matter). I wear them several hours a day, every work day for Zoom calls, etc. They’ve traveled with me and are great for flights.

      I’d buy another pair (of the newer model) in a heartbeat.

  • neardeaf@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And here I am mourning the soon to be death of my Bose QuietComfort 35 WIRED earbuds with the insanely soft comfortable silicone ear tips with WINGS that fit super snug & comfy, never fall out.

    I’ve yet to find a sub 120-150 dollar replacement for them. I’ve been using them daily for like 10+ years :(

    • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly, you’re in for a treat once you find a good replacement. “Comfort” and “wired” are an oxymoron. Wireless headphones can be so much more comfortable.

      Is there a reason you’re not willing to spend a bit more? I’m on my third set of padding for my current headphones. Good headphones last a very long time and it’s worth spending a bit more money.

      • snowbell@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never had a problem with wires on my headphones, I don’t really get why it bothers people so much. 30 foot headphone cable plugged into my PC = bliss. Basically as good as wireless.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll stay wired for the foreseeable future. Headphones I have to charge just seem like an extra inconvenience to me.

    • Xanvial@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sony XM series have wired mode. Although the noice cancel feature still needs battery

      • moonw0man@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use my XM4’s wired with my PC every day because I don’t like Bluetooth latency but love these headphones. The flexibility of wireless when I need it occasionally is great though! (Like today I’ll use them on a flight later)

  • Supersonic Stork@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly the average user should probably go wireless. The convenience factor is huge, and most of these new headphones come with active noise cancelling.

    The average pair of wireless headphones is also good enough for casual listening (depending on codec) and can come pretty close to wired solutions.

    That said, I would never go for wireless on ear/over ear headphones again. The more features something has, the harder it is to fix when something breaks.

    My wireless solution is a set of mmcx in ear monitors connected via Bluetooth adapter. Even without active noise cancellation, they block out sound well. For desktop my job requires critical listening, and I like neutral signatures, so I’d rather stick to desktop monitors and wired solutions.

    • ArtificialLink@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The convenience of wireless is great but it also means you’ll need new headphones right around ever 5 years.

      Wired is still the best option hands down imo. I can buy headphones that last for decades not years.

      • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        See I’ve had the opposite problem. Every single pair of wired headphones I’ve ever owned, except for my current pair, has failed when the wire had flexed too much. I suspect the current pair has lasted so long because I’ve almost entirely switched to wireless.

        Some really expensive small ones I’ve used can fail after single digit hours of use (luckily work pays for those… and they’re willing to make that compromise for nearly invisible cables). I keep a box of a dozen new sets ready to go under my desk, they’re several hundred dollars each. We don’t allow the wearer to put them on or take them off - an assistant carefully does it and tapes the cable to their skin under their clothes to try to reduce the risk of failure.

        Obviously there are wired headphones with thicker / stronger cables, but those come with serious comfort compromises which most people just are not willing to make. There are jobs where you need a wired pair. I work one of those jobs. For any other situation though, I think wireless is better, and I use wireless as much as I can.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have tried several, and been thoroughly unimpressed. My advice is to save up and spend the extra money on ANC that’s actually good. Sony and Bose both make EXCELLENT cans with great battery life. QuietComfort from Bose, and the WH-1000XM series from Sony. Don’t cheap out, you’ll get an inferior product.

      You can get them used if you want, usually for under $200. Just replace the ear pads if you’re paranoid about germs. I got a used set of WH-1000XM3’s from a friend and they’ve been amazing, for two years now.

      You can find similar prices on eBay, or here: https://www.unclaimedbaggage.com/collections/headphones#/filter:vendor:Bose/filter:vendor:Sony/filter:ss_filter_type:On$2520Ear$252FOver$2520Ear

      Unclaimed Baggage is a cool website, they sell stuff that people left on airplanes. Looks like there isn’t much in stock at the moment, but check back periodically and you’ll see a lot of good Bose deals.

    • ProtoDan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find poorly implemented anc on cheap headphones to be painful. You’d be better off looking for good sound isolation.

      • afunkysongaday@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got no experience with ANC in over-ears. It’s weird: with in-ears, you get pretty good ANC even in the cheaper <$50 ones. But it seems like you can’t get decent quality anc in cheaper over-ears…

        Slightly rephrasing my question: what’s the least I have to spend for over-ears decent quality and?