Edit: To clarify:

Is it even possible, financially speaking, to keep adding storage? I mean, advertisements don’t even make a lot of money, is the indefinite growth of server storage even sustainable?

Or will they do what Twitch does with old content and just delete them?

  • flyingjake@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work in cloud computing and it’s amazing to me how magical people like you think it is. Yes Google owns YouTube, but could still run out of resources if Google chooses, they are still at the mercy of their provider.

    Services may be setup to dynamically grow but they are still consuming finite physical resources and would run out if the provider doesn’t expand those resources.

    The cloud most certainly can lose data due to hard drive failure and other hardware issues; the services are designed to make that very unlikely, but cloud services also have disaster recovery options you must implement if you want to be truly isolated from a given hardware footprint.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if Google allows to runout of space the it willing. That is quite circular.

      The amount of data YouTube is processing is not going to be affected by a small brigade.

      Please cite when YouTube has lost content because of storage failure.

      Do you understand the infrastructure Google has built around their services to prevent data loss?

      I’m not arguing any fool with a cloud account cannot lose data. This is specifically about YouTube.