• meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just block it at the ISP who puts this feature into the actual browser has this country even used the web before???

    • ox0r@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brother, you don’t know how fucking tech illiterate our government is (with a nice topping of being wannabe autocrats)

    • AccidentalLemming@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I assume they’re doing both to make the censorship harder to circumvent. Even with an alternative DNS provider or a VPN that’s hosted in a country they have no authority over, the browser’s still gonna catch it.

      The harder you make it, the fewer people will attempt it and the higher the chance is that citizens will mess up.

        • bitwolf@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How can I read more about that website? Is it a snowflake node or something?

          • twack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s theoretical, it’s not a real website and 10.anything should be a local IP address.

            It just illustrates that you can access a website through a browser without using a domain name.