• suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, that wasn’t the “reason” like you want to make it sound by using because without any modifier like “also”.

      • t3h_fool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “They indicted 7 people for Terrorism last year, in part because they encrypted their disks, used tail as their OS and signal for communication.” would work maybe.

          • ADTJ@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s my native language and I have no idea what they’re getting at either.

            Don’t worry…

        • phonyphanty@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.

          • suction@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            More words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.