Absolutely no jokery allowed it seems XD

  • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m gonna have to explain this out very simply: blackface has a long history going back more than a century before Obama was even born.

    There do exist racist caricatures of Chinese people with squinty eyes. Pooh does not have the squinty eyes. Ive yet to see any evidence of Pooh being used as a racist caricature before Xi Jinping.

    none of his personality resembles pooh, it’s just his race, if anything he’s ruthlessly efficient

    I think you accidentally admitted the real issue: Pooh is silly, soft, and generally not that smart. Certain types of rulers need to be seen as strong, powerful, and perhaps even ruthless at all times.

    The real offense is a possible degradation of his “strong man” image.

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’m gonna have to explain this out very simply: blackface has a long history going back more than a century before Obama was even born.

      what does this have to do with anything

      There do exist racist caricatures of Chinese people with squinty eyes. Pooh does not have the squinty eyes. Ive yet to see any evidence of Pooh being used as a racist caricature before Xi Jinping.

      okay, he’s still yellow… and who cares if it was used before that or not? I genuinely have no idea what that has to do with anything

      As a forum moderator, you see chinese person being a yellow bear, and tigger being obama… seems racist, better remove because it seems like a racist charicature.

      None of the history of it matters at all in my eyes. I honestly and genuinely don’t see why it matters to you.

      I think you accidentally admitted the real issue: Pooh is silly, soft, and generally not that smart. Certain types of rulers need to be seen as strong, powerful, and perhaps even ruthless at all times. The real offense is a possible degradation of his “strong man” image.

      then make a charicature that makes fun of that and isn’t yellow, I would be fine with that

      • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        then make a charicature that makes fun of that and isn’t yellow, I would be fine with that

        How would you feel about a white Pooh bear?

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Weird, but for design reasons, I’d be COMPLETELY fine with making fun of Xi with that, if that had been the original design of winnie, though

          It really just comes down to winnie being yellow, for me.

          • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So you’re arguing that the historical context of Pooh"s design matters, and I fully agree.

            .

            Would it make a difference to know that these are the original designs? Would you consider the original designs to be permittable?

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              32 minutes ago

              No, because my claim is not that the author of winnie the pooh created a racist charicature, my claim is that the author of the meme did.

              if the author of the meme used these versions the meme would be fine