I cannot repost what Flying Squid was posting here, because it involved highly disturbing and dangerous content, including:

Content Warning

Graphic content, harassment, self-harm, and suicidal ideation, which I reported immediately.

While this behavior is shocking, it’s not completely out of left field, as members of this community and platform will already be familiar with their behavior. Flying Squid has long been regarded as one of the least productive and most problematic mods on all of Lemmy, often picking fights and abusing their mod privileges. I view this change as a positive step for Squid, .world, and Lemmy as a whole.

  • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’d only be enforcing what probably is going to happen voluntarily anyways. My guess is it will be months before he uses the account again because he’ll want the drama of ‘did he do it?’ to play out. (edit: turns out he could only wait 24hr, guess he is less patient than I assumed)

    If I thought it wasn’t too much I wouldn’t have said it, and you saying it is literally supports the first paragraph (edit: which makes it a hilarious joke if that was your intention). He shouldn’t be on Lemmy. The damage he’s done over time is incalculable and what good would come of letting him back on? Besides it’s not like even that could stop him anyways.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’d only be enforcing what probably is going to happen voluntarily anyways.

      What the fuck? What is this comment?

      I definitely think, at this point, that there is a little cabal of people who are devoted to harassing FlyingSquid, not just about his moderation but on a personal level, and they aren’t stopping even when it sounds like he is clearly mentally struggling right now. That’s fucked up. Don’t do that.

      You said “call out his BS, get asked for evidence, show evidence, it isn’t enough” along with a lot of personal attacks towards FlyingSquid. What is your evidence of him being a PTB? Literally the only thing I have seen after asking this question a few times is that he sometimes argues with people, and a few months ago made a mistake on a report and didn’t realize that multiple copies of the same message were all different reports about duplicated spam content, IDK, some weird honest-mistake situation like that. And he’s rude to people sometimes. Nothing about banning people unnecessarily, or setting arbitrary rules for content removal, or anything like that, which is normally what I think of as PTB. Not “arguing.”

      What is your evidence for him being a PTB? I promise, it’ll be “enough,” I’ll take it seriously if there is any.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I definitely think, at this point, that there is a little cabal of people who are devoted to harassing

        Definitely. I haven’t seen evidence (though I might be wrong) that it’s any more than one user with a bunch of discuss.online alts. One of their alts DMd me immediately after Squid’s removal saying “you’re welcome” as though I am thankful for harassment just because I don’t like the guy. Honestly I hope this user doing the harassment gets IP banned. Imagine taking pride in provoking someone’s mental health. Freakish.

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          What, return2ozma, the precursor to UniversalMonk? That’s the PTB is that FlyingSquid banned him?

          He’s calmed down recently, but he used to be pretty spammy and unapologetic about it. He was finally banned “officially” because he basically said that he was seeking out specifically anti-Biden stuff and posting a steady stream of it to make sure that side of the story got some heavy airtime on Lemmy, as if there was a shortage of it. I’m not convinced that that should be the final straw in terms of handing someone a ban, but there was broad agreement from the mod team that he should be banned.

          It also, as far as I can tell, wasn’t FlyingSquid that banned him. Unless it was from an alt used for admin, or something?

          https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModBanFromCommunity&modId=477305&userId=580006

          Edit: Update: Here’s all the actions that FS took against return2ozma. Looks pretty legit to me.

          https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&modId=477305&userId=580006

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            He’s calmed down recently, but he used to be pretty spammy and unapologetic about it. He was finally banned “officially” because he basically said that he was seeking out specifically anti-Biden stuff and posting a steady stream of it to make sure that side of the story got some heavy airtime on Lemmy, as if there was a shortage of it.

            TIL, then I’m surprised he didn’t get banned earlier.

            It also, as far as I can tell, wasn’t FlyingSquid that banned him. Unless it was from an alt used for admin, or something?

            Wait, aren’t bans impossible to trace to the mod who did them? I remember this being something to avoid mod harassment

            • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              TIL, then I’m surprised he didn’t get banned earlier.

              Yeah, Jordan made a whole specific post explaining about the ban, it was that big an issue. That’s why I called him the precursor. He was stumping for third parties and flooding various channels with reasons why Biden is the worst, every single day, and they let him do it for quite a while before eventually taking action on it.