75% of the anti-piracy discussions I see rarely blame companies like Nintendo or Disney and always try to talk about how piracy is immoral, and you should feel “dirty” for doing it. My question is why do people seem to hate those who pirate more than the bad practices of mega-corporations or the fact that they don’t want to preserve their media?

  • ArcticPrincess@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    If everyone were doing it, it wouldn’t be piracy. It would be free, legal copying.

    I just presented you with several models of how big budget movies could make money, even if everyone were freely, legally copying. You haven’t responded to that argument, you’ve merely ignored it and insisted on your original point.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t feel like defending a view that I don’t hold. I don’t get the sense from your replies that you’ve even understood my argument.

      Without the current economic model, no-one would pay for big budget productions

      I haven’t said that.

      It doesn’t, as you imply, reduce the likelihood of big budget media existing in the future

      I haven’t said that either.

      a centralised fund we all contribute to in proportion to our means

      Correct me if I’m wrong but that sounds a lot like paying for the content

      many small scale investors… …like Kickstarter

      This sounds like paying for the content too.

      a legislated solution that protects copyright until artists are sufficiently recompensed

      Recompensed? Sounds like getting paid.

      To me it seems like there’s no disagreement here.