0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoIt do be like thatsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1930arrow-down113
arrow-up1917arrow-down1imageIt do be like thatsh.itjust.works0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareTunaCowboy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoImagine your livelihood depending on adobe, how do you take yourself seriously?
minus-squareFellowEnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoPro retoucher here. Guess I’m just a silly goose them.
minus-squareTunaCowboy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoI mean you’re not a ‘pro retoucher’ if you require adobe to do your job, you’re simply an adobe user.
minus-squareFellowEnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·22 hours agoI mean that makes absolutely no sense at all. It’s what the professionals use for good reason.
minus-squareZiglin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoPopularity alone doesn’t make it good (see ms windows) and yet it is still what professionals use because it’s popular.
minus-squareFellowEnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 hours agoYeah, what makes it good is the unparalelled feature set, which is also why the pros use it.
Imagine your livelihood depending on adobe, how do you take yourself seriously?
Pro retoucher here. Guess I’m just a silly goose them.
I mean you’re not a ‘pro retoucher’ if you require adobe to do your job, you’re simply an adobe user.
I mean that makes absolutely no sense at all. It’s what the professionals use for good reason.
Popularity alone doesn’t make it good (see ms windows) and yet it is still what professionals use because it’s popular.
Yeah, what makes it good is the unparalelled feature set, which is also why the pros use it.