• Goronmon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean yeah but gamers keep supporting shitty companies…

    Yeah, shitty companies like Valve with their lootbox nonsense and other gambling mechanics are really bringing the industry down.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The argument of cosmetic only microtransactions is also a bit of a weak one because it’s the sort of content that would usually just be in the base game, unlockable via gameplay or tied to cheat codes. At least this used to be the case.

        Cosmetic only is still better than other types but it’s still a case of the lesser of two evils.

        • dfc09@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the only reason anybody says that is because we’re so desensitized by pay-to-win mechanics and games being released half finished with day 1 dlc to fill the gaps, so we say “at least it’s better than that”

          Remember horse armor? I bet there’s plenty of video games out now with cosmetic horse armor for sale.

        • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What’s wrong with it? Literally every single gameplay-related item in both Dota and CSGO are free. 100%, no strings attached. You can experience the entire game and what it has to offer without spending a dime. At some point you have to charge for something. These companies aren’t making these game out of charity, they are in fact businesses. You can criticize the methods they use to push them (lootboxes, BP, etc) but I don’t see a problem with the concept.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We game for what we game for. Some people game for the cosmetics. They are selling what consumers buy. I’m not saying it’s right. But if they keep buying why wouldn’t they sell it?

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cosmetic-only microtransactions in Free to Play games are absolutely fine, and should be encouraged. Those games wouldn’t exist without them.

          In paid games it’s a different matter though, sure.

        • eliza_stats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like the way Grinding Gear does it with POE, a FTP game supported by cosmetic-only micro transactions. The stash tabs are the closest thing to “pay to win”.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I like Valve but fuck those loot boxes, their tolerance of gambling, and screw that bs excuse of “it’s only cosmetic” because we know it’s not and it preys on the same insecurities and uses the same psychological tools to maximize profits using addiction.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, Valve’s CS loot boxes and ignoring of the gambling sites that profit off of gamers addiction is absolutely bullshit but you’re a disingenuous troll if you think Valve is the leading offender of shitty monetization rampant in the industry.