Optical Emgineer reporting in.

This is bullshite.

Read for yourselves:
https://www.quora.com/Can-we-use-a-microscope-as-a-telescope-by-just-inverting-it

What you can learn today is, that if you use a microscope “the other way around”, something big is imaged into somethjng small on the focal plane.
Zeiss, a company that manufactures a shitton of optical stuff, has a very successful semi-conductor branch. That branch started off when some engineers from the microscope-department fiddled around with " inverted" microscopes during their lunchtime to create the first optics for lithography from Zeiss.

Source: i worked there. I know those engineers.

See, if a refugee exists that actually has a job and can pay for its own life, Ronny, Tschantall and Maik are reminded that they dont have a job and cant pay for their own shit. And as long as this is happening they need to shit on whoever is actually not a lowlife looser because this very fact makes em feel shitty. So they vote afd because its always easier to shit on others than trying to get your own shit together.

“NoW tRy DoInG a TuRkEy In 10 MiNuTeS!”

Lots of stuff can be cooked in short times and the mere existence of food that is more complicated is no argument against this. Try again. :p

Yepp.

And making a simple cheese sauce takes you the time that the pasta cooks.

Heat broth or milk or both slowly in a pot. Shredd cheese (i like a mix of bluecheese and swiss) and add. Stirr until solved. Add salt, pepper, nutmeg, a dash of white wine. Either use potatoe-starch to thicken or use enough cheese to have it be thick by itself.

Takes you 10 mins tops.

Well, i get that.

And too, many “sauces” you could cook for your pasta are easy, cheaper and wont cost you a second more time thn the pasta needs to cook.

Did someone find the info, what “high-temperature” actually means? I must have missed that part in the article. Thanks in advance :)

Your statementade me google the statistics and reports for my country (Germany) and i found a credible source that says that up to 40% of victims of relationship-violence are men and that the numbers might be even higher as men dont talk aboit this, its a “taboo” cause men need to be tough and all.

Just sharing my source, maybe you have one too? Would be interested to read more into this.

https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/186686/Haeusliche-Gewalt-gegen-Maenner-Unbeachtet-und-tabuisiert

Nae, you do.

Men are less likely to say they are the victim, specially if the aggressor is the wife. Men are supposed to “man up” if they have problems. Statistics show that women can and are agressors.

And, most important, just because there might be less men who are victims doesnt mean they should not get the very same help if they need it. Coming around with a shitty “oh, its science!” argument is lame and perpetuates the stupid role model where men are not and cannot be the victim and if that it is not bad because its only a few.

Any victim, no matter the gender, deserves help, no matter how many there are, period.

Oh, no tumblr, no story.

Then maybe open it and read a bit?