My take is that you can train AI on whatever you want for research purposes, but if you brazenly distribute models trained on other people’s content, you should be liable for theft, especially if you are profiting off of it.
Just because AI has so much potential doesn’t mean we should be reckless and abusive with it. Just because we can build a plagiarism machine capable of reproducing facsimiles of humanity doesn’t mean that how we are building that is ethical or legal.
Well, now that you know that this content is AI generated, and that this community doesn’t allow that, your next move should likely be whatever a responsible member of the community would do when made aware that they aren’t meeting the expectations of their peers. I suppose we’ll get to see what that looks like, if you’re not off flying a kite yourself.
Funny how they argue that they are content neutral every time someone calls them out for having Nazi customers, but they are more than happy to censor for capitalists.
Well, the gigantic pile of low-end audio I ripped using yt-dlp begs to differ. Half a million tracks so far. Perfect for my OpenSwim headphones. Tiny mp3s to maximize my 4GB of storage, and shit quality to match what I’m getting from bone conductors (which are, for no compelling reason, compatible with FLAC).
I swim a lot, and have a lot of free disk space, so I promise this makes sense.
Yes, it’s a torrent site. Yes, it’s called Torrent Galaxy.
Is it related to the real Torrent Galaxy? Probably not.
I was an early Lemmy user, and joined back when .ml was basically the only choice.
It was weird, but the thing that really got me considering a different instance was just how many words they added to their censor list.
I messaged the admins and told them that it wasn’t a great system, because it censors posts with “removed” whenever a forbidden word is used, and because of that I can’t tell the difference between someone saying “bitch” and someone saying the n-word. How am I supposed to know whether or not to report such a comment if the offense part is obscured. “What a stupid removed” could be slightly sexist, or indefensibly racist.
They told me “All slurs are bad, you should report those comments just the same”.
Ay, fuck you guys, the words I gave you as examples are absolutely not equally bad, or at least, anyone with a functioning brain wouldn’t make that argument…
This is only marginally less sad than grown men wearing their letterman jackets.
I heard it’s not a real crime if the white powder is inert.
Bill Oefelein and Lisa Nowak absolutely banged in space. Zero-G orgasms will drive a person to crime.
Fake!
The weight limit for prepaid postage is 3.5oz, which is why you should copy all the info from the postcard and print it onto lots of envelopes which you then fill with 3.5oz of garbage each and dump into a public mailbox.
That’s fair, but it doesn’t answer any of the questions about what should be improved. “Industry standards” is a vacuous term when the standard is defined by a singular piece of software made by one company.
Sure, GIMP isn’t Photoshop, and those familiar with Photoshop will have to re-learn things to use it. But what exactly needs to be changed? The developers have no chance of improving the program if the feedback is this generic.
I feel like the issue is that people expect a “Photoshop killer” to be Photoshop verbatim. Instead of focusing on making a good tool, people just constantly compare it to the commercial pack leader.
Most of the complaints I hear about GIMP are just “x isn’t like Photoshop”. I would take the complaints more seriously if any of the people voicing them could actually articulate what should be improved.
Was anyone complaining?
Great conversation and all, but I’m not subtle. Where can I find this yaoi at?
I guess it’s just weird to see that someone has a Russian name and assume that they must be here by order of Putin and/or Trump. You come across as unhinged a racist Republican talking to literally any Asian person where they assume they must be a Communist working for China.
Look, ACAB and all that, but after doing a lot of googling, I did finally find proof that that “Olga Fedorova” does in fact exist, and is a “journalist”, but being a nightcrawler for FreedomNewsTV doesn’t deserve the respect some of you seem to want to give her.
A quick look at the website, and I think these cops attacked one of their allies.
Copyright infringement becomes theft when you make money off of someone else’s work, which is the goal of every one of these AI companies. I 100% mean theft.