Imagine arguing for the victim’s safety except for when the criminal is rich enough to pay for their temporary release.

People also forget that Google doesn’t give the same results for everyone. Sure you could use incognito mode, but how many people are going to do that when they’re looking for normal stuff?

Besides, what better way to say ‘I love you’ than with the gift of a spatula.

There’s the thing about “'Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.” But then there’s it’s corollary “any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.”

I’m other words, Molyneux should know better by now, and the fact that he clearly doesn’t can only come from a willful refusal to.

He was a grifter and a threat to society. I’m not going to say I’m happy he’s dead, but I’ll sure nod along when other people do.

(I mean, I’d have preferred he live and work to undo the damage he’s caused, but I’m not an idiot)

You do see how it could have a chilling effect on engagement if the “someone” judging you negatively for your vote is, say, a repressive government, right? And what’s the point of a social network without engagement?