![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://slrpnk.net/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeddit.de%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fb4871535-c973-4496-aa73-9b36d14a03ee.png)
So, dig deeper with machines powered with the excess energy. I don’t see the issue…
(I’m half-joking.)
So, dig deeper with machines powered with the excess energy. I don’t see the issue…
(I’m half-joking.)
No, the possessive apostrophe doesn’t apply to possessive pronouns. Apostrophes in pronouns are for abbreviations (like “he is” becomes “he’s” and “it is” becomes “it’s”)
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/pronouns-possessive-my-mine-your-yours-etc
And: https://promova.com/content/86_Possessive_Pronouns_in_English_41a7b3d23c.png
Apple and its* policies.
Did you really have to use that stupid “fake news headline” phrase? Gross.
D-e-o-x-y-r-i-b-o-n-u-c-l-e-i-c a-c-i-d
Goodbye.
It’s totally inhumane but also no living thing was harmed, so - all good.
oysters?
Edit: OP originally wrote “Osters.” No need to downvote.
Dammit. You cod me.
You’re technically correct.
I’d say 50 times.
Yes it is lol.
It’s just that “me and X” is very popular.
I learned to accept it. I will never accept switching your for you’re, though.
I like the concept…
Den of the thicc.
Hail Satan!
Then don’t go there.
Right? It’s like the Town of Swastika, Ontario. Hardly any swastikas visible anywhere!
I thought of Pascal, Java and C#, but pretty much any language listed here as “explicit / nominal / static” makes the cut:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming_languages_by_type_system
It is not false, but if that’s what you want to believe, go ahead. Have a nice day.
If developers make those decisions, then they’re the publishers.
Are we going to continue going round this circle?
Car making without the tracking bullshit!