![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
2·
7 months ago- Wings of Fury
- Populous
- F/A18 Interceptor
- Pool of Radiance
- International Karate+
- Jetset Willy (also Blagger, Monty Mole series and other similar games)
And if one sentence isn’t enough, the commit has too many changes
OP could MINT their own money with those skills.
LodgeMINT of resignation
Your clothes and anything you are carrying don’t teleport with you
Workflow? Jesus Christ I just want a coffee that’s nicer than the instant powder.
Just calculate the equivalent drop in working hours required to get a reasonable hourly rate, then spend the difference in time playing ping pong.
That would only add one extra process instance with each call. The pipe makes it add 2 extra processes with each call, making the number of processes grow exponentially instead of only linearly.
Edit: Also, Im not at a computer to test this, but since the child is forked in the background (due to &), the parent is free to exit at that point, so your version would probably just effectively have 1-2 processes at a time, although the last one would have a new pid each time, so it would be impossible to get the pid and then kill it before it has already replaced itself. The original has the same “feature”, but with exponentially more to catch on each recursion. Each child would be reparented by pid 1, so you could kill them by killing pid 1 i guess (although you dont want to do that… and there would be a few you wouldn’t catch because they weren’t reparented yet)