If you want any change in this, you should formally express your concern using A2A missiles. If they protest, formally deny it. This is what they do after all, isn’t it?
If you want any change in this, you should formally express your concern using A2A missiles. If they protest, formally deny it. This is what they do after all, isn’t it?
Where do you shop local? I think the public lost when they let down mom and pop shops in favor of these megacorps. They wouldn’t have had the leverage to jack up price gouging and inflation so much otherwise.
Of course they’re learning. Learning how to bullshit and gaslight normal people into accepting their dystopian and draconian ambitions.
What is the fundamental reason why people fall for antivax propaganda?
Democracy and the right to dissent are meant to oppose abuse like these. Why isn’t anyone protesting?
Have you noticed how the modern AI models absolutely tow the line of its creators? Just like this example, there’s another one where an image generator refuses to generate the image of Mickey Mouse from Steamboat Willie, even though its copyright expired recently. The same model has no problem violating the copyrights of independent artists.
And while these models can strictly refuse to avoid what its creators don’t want it to do, they fail at basic prompts like ‘show a black doctor’. These models are pathologically rife with biases from its creators.
How does GDPR mandate a public audit of the code base? Is there such a provision in it? (Not a confrontational question)
There are two disturbing tendencies being demonstrated here:
These companies need a few high profile hefty penalties as a motivation to avoid such dirty tricks.
It’s not complete. The HR decided to censor the rest.
I implore you to go to some place outside North America for a month and use trains twice a day. Even the worst choices are better than VIA rail.
I don’t like the monarchy either. But I assume you haven’t seen anyone suffer from cancer. If you did, it’s a misery you won’t wish on your worst enemies.
He should keep it and rename himself. It suits him more.
They diverted the funding for AI? AI is already a way for rich crooks to steal and make money off public information, if not an outright hype that grifters employ to attract funding for their devious pursuits. None of this is AI’s fault. But politicians should understand the type of people they are funding, instead of ignorantly falling for buzzwords.