Statūs, bitte

Seems like clients vary wildly in how they interpret this markup. This is how it shows on Sync:

Yeah, but by generating with AI you’re incentivized to skip that initial research stage into your own code base, leading you to completely miss opportunities for consolidation or reuse

I mean… Yes? If there’s a way to do something without having to take my hands off the steering wheel I’ll use that

At the danger of being whooshed here - with Goat simulator specifically, I think it’s pretty obvious that the game is overall not meant to be taken seriously, including the title.

Maybe I’m missing something, but I think this doesn’t print or otherwise reproduce its own source code, so it’s not a quine afaict.

Looks very much like it! I’m a bit jealous, they were already out of stock when I looked at getting one

reserves the right to sell you out

Is Canonical actually doing that, though? Collecting data for product improvement purposes and collecting it to potentially sell to third parties are two wildly different things, and doing the former, even with the user’s consent, does not mean you automatically reserve the right to do the latter (or anything else, really) with the collected data, unless you explicitly already include that as an option and get consent for it as well. I haven’t looked into it myself, so I might be wrong here, but I’m guessing Canonical would be getting way more shit for this if they were actually reserving the right to outright sell the telemetry they’re collecting, rather than just use it for product planning and development.

Even I myself am not gonna remember how to use my tool a couple months down the line, unless it's something I use very regularly.

Edit: noticed I read the comment I'm replying to wrong, reworded to make more sense

Oftentimes, just a couple of pieces are responsible for the high price, because they’re rare in the specific color being used in the MOC. Sort the part list by price, and you’ll quickly be able to identify what the problem is, and see if you have similar pieces already that’ll do the job, or if you can just substitute a different color that’s cheaper to get, for example. It also helps to have your own collection logged on rebrickable, as it’ll show you how many of the required pieces you already own!

That specifically excludes accounts with YouTube channels though, if I remember correctly

Not really self-hosted in the typical sense, but Obsidian with the Tasks and/or Kanban plugin synced through a (self-hosted) solution of your choice could work?

Haven’t tried the whiteboard tool in Google keep (didn’t even know there was one), but the Excalidraw plugin for Obsidian should cover almost any whiteboard use case I can think of. A bit more limited but also good is the native Canvas plugin in Obsidian.

That’s how literally all language change happens? People just start using words differently or use new words, it slowly spreads, until a majority is using it. You can either embrace it and be happy you get new tools to express yourself with, or reenact the “old man yells at clouds” meme and be grumpy. I know which one I’ll choose.

Check out this one: https://thegradient.pub/othello/

In it, researchers built a custom LLM trained to play a board game just by predicting the next move in a series of moves, with no input at all about the game state. They found evidence of an internal representation of the current game state, although the model had never been told what that game state looks like.

So what? This is not about creating an absolutely fair world, it’s about improving heavily unfair systems.

I don’t understand your negativity. How else would you write a proposal for a completely new system to be talked about, if not in an idealistic and prescriptive manner? That’s the first step to then start a discussion about it and find and fix the aspects that people expect to not work in practice.

Makes sense, thanks for elaborating :)

I transitioned (ugh I hate that word)

Slightly off topic but I’m curious, why do you hate that word and is there different wording that you’d prefer?

Those last three input boxes are all parameters to fine tune the operation of the key derivation function, they control the performance and hardware usage characteristics of how to derive the actual database encryption key from your password in order to make it harder to brute force.

The Transform Rounds input essentially controls how much sequential processing power is needed by repeating a specific part of the KDF more or less often, and thus allows you to determine how long the key derivation will take every time. That’s why there’s a Benchmark button next to it - it will automatically test on your CPU and determine how many rounds are needed to produce a 1 second delay on your hardware. Which is an acceptable time to wait for your database to unlock, but bad news for someone trying to brute force your password, as it limits how many attempts different passwords they can test in a given time.

Memory usage controls the amount of memory the KDF needs, and Parallelism controls how many parallel threads are used, both limiting how many parallel attempts at brute forcing your password a potential attacker can run on any given hardware.

Disclaimer: I’m not a security expert, just a software developer who has come into contact with KDFs quite a bit. If I misrepresented anything above, happy for correction!