You know what this reminds me of? Alex Jones repeatedly lying about the Sandy Hook school shooting and having to pay over a billion dollars after his followers repeatedly harassed and threatened those families.
How is this thoroughly debunked lying by Trump and Vance any different?
JSON Problem Details
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9457
This specification’s aim is to define common error formats for applications that need one so that they aren’t required to define their own …
So why aren’t you using problem details?
It cannot tell you since then a human would become aware of this information.
At the same time, you’re forcing it to extract this information. Yet you haven’t told it the timeframe within which to answer.
Obviously, the solution it has come up with to satisfy your request within these constraints is to answer very slowly. So slowly that the answer won’t be revealed until it can be certain that humanity will already be extinct.
Given that it provided us with the first word in 30 min, we should all be very concerned.
Isn’t it available on PS5?
Sure, I agree.
Unfortunately, no such solution currently exists or has been widely adopted.
I use an app called Recipe Keeper. It’s amazing because I just share the page to the app, it extracts the recipe without any nonsense, and now I have a copy for later if I want to reuse it. I literally never bother scrolling recipe pages because of how terrible they all are, and I decide in the app if the recipe is one I want to keep.
It also bypasses paywalls and registration requirements for many sites because the recipe data is still on the page for crawlers even if it’s not rendered for a normal visitor.
You’re in the wrong Rochester!
Really interesting! I wonder what would happen if you combine these two properties. Suppose some length of the middle is all walls, and the hooks are infill, or vice versa. Is there an optimal mix that maximizes the weight it can support in your testing, or have you found the optimal configuration (with infill along the entire length) already?
The only way to accomplish what you propose is to switch our elections to ranked choice voting.
Otherwise, I’m sorry but you’re stuck with the two major party choices.
the DNC will also never change, if their actions have no consequences.
What consequences do you propose?
Suburbanite: Child, go open the instacart app on my phone and have some eggs delivered by an underpaid driver for $35.
I disagree. You should have validation at each layer, as it’s easier to handle bad inputs and errors the earlier they are caught.
It’s especially important in this case with email because often one or more of the following comes into play when you’re dealing with an email input:
I’m not suggesting that validation of an email should attempt to be exhaustive, but a well thought-out implementation validates all user inputs. Even the underlying API in this example is validating the email you give it before trying to send an email through its own underlying API.
Passing obvious garbage inputs down is just bad practice.
Yes, but no. Pretty much every application that accepts an email address on a form is going to turn around and make an API call to send that email. Guess what that API is going to do when you send it a string for a recipient address without an @ sign? It’s going to refuse it with an error.
Therefore the correct amount of validation is that which satisfies whatever format the underlying API requires.
For example, AWS SES requires addresses in the form UserName@[SubDomain.]Domain.TopLevelDomain along with other caveats. If the application is using SES to send emails, I’m not going to allow an input that doesn’t meet those requirements.
You can also mark designs as ready-only and they no longer count, so this limit is really 10 concurrently editable designs. I just keep everything read-only unless I’m actively working on it.
0lbs ≠ 0kg in the absence of gravity.
Honestly I don’t understand what’s wrong with the subscription model. You get YouTube ad free and YouTube music.
Download Bambu Studio and slice some multi material prints. The preview tells you how much filament will be purged. There are several settings and model characteristics that will affect the purged volume.
Flushing volume: this directly controls the volume purged while swapping between any two filaments. Darker to lighter colors will need a higher flushing volume. You’ll also need a higher flushing volume when changing materials.
Purge to infill: this reduces the purged volume by accounting for the volume that can be printed as infill before reaching perimeters. It’s not very effective for smaller models because there is just less infill area.
Printing multiple copies: this reduces the ratio of waste to printed parts, since for each layer you’ll need the same number of filament swaps.
Part orientation: often the part orientation will have a dramatic effect on the number of filament swaps. Imagine a blue cube with a red face. This can be optimized to one color swap if the red face is horizontal instead of vertical.
Print sequentially: For multiple parts on the plate, grouping them by color similarity and printing groups sequentially can reduce the number of swaps. Imagine two blue parts and two red parts on the same plate. This can be optimized to one color swap for the entire print instead of one swap per layer.
In my experience, the waste for average complexity multicolor prints is similar in scale to supports, and is easily offset if you’re upgrading from a less reliable printer. Failed prints are filament waste too.
Haha I’ll bite. What’s your suggestion?
Or wear a respirator while you sand…