No. People who want the benefit of self housing without worrying about hardware will rent a vps or something simpler. The hard part of hardware isn’t the purchase, it’s the maintenance.

Also, why the separate router?

I don’t see how the two are related.

Erfurt, what a shithole.

Have you passed their captive portal before turning on the VPN?

Yeah, they’re put there by a tomatow-truck.

That sounds like a fig leaf for Google to hide very anti-competitive behavior…

You know what, you’re right, I may be too cynical.

Given the fuckups around definitive editions and the fact that there’s already so many great, free, open source Doom engines and content, this feels like a money grab and a step backwards.

Did Mozilla signal any intention to phase out V2 though? It makes sense for them to support both, as a lot of extensions (that don’t rely on V2 features that are missing from V3) are going to be built for V3 now and if Mozilla wants to keep their extension store full. If they didn’t offer both versions, extensions developers might disregard Firefox as a platform because of its low usage share numbers if they had to maintain two different architectures.

Wonder why they wouldn’t use OSM.

One rule could be censoring information that could plausibly out someone, such as the name of a (step?)family-member

I mean, it must be very difficult to checks notes host a static document in a scalable way.

But still, if only they had an asynchronous, distributed way of publishing this information. Like old school letters, only digital. That would help them decrease the load on their infrastructure…

It’s alright. I use both their desktop backup service and B2 extensively. Their desktop client and web interface is very basic and a bit rough, you don’t buy their service for the well-developed UI. The service works as advertised though.

The headache comes up when multiple third party repositories start conflicting with each other

Which is traditionally why you needed the distro to package your software…

It’s absolutely fine, it was mildly annoying the first two times and now in glad I don’t have to hold the cap while drinking.

You don’t quite understand. One of the major drawbacks of UUIDs over monotonically increasing id’s is the lack of ability to sort them. Not just for manual querying, but for index operations, caching, data locality etc.

It’s very handy and is a big part of the reason why Twitter developed Snowflake IDs, which are basically like UUIDs v6 and v7.

The UUIDs specs are quite easy to understand and definitely not “enterprisey”.

They chose “version” because they are just that, versions. Improvements over the original design that benefit from new insights and technological improvements. We’re lucky they had the foresight to include a version number in the spec.

A lot of people in this thread who don’t fully understand how UUIDs work…

See also: the XKCD spin on it

Depends on why you want to hide your server ip, what’s your use case? Is it to protect against DDOS?

Cloudflare is evil, but is there any other party you would trust to share everything with?

Don’t worry, it’s fine, there’s nothing inherently wrong with running stateful workload in a container.