Do you think any indie developer has the means to achieve a lower cost to distribution and promotion if they try to sell and support the game themselves?

Valve solves many problems for developers and these problems aren’t imaginary and free to resolve.

Not saying 30% is justified for all games, but if you want a quality title it’s going to cost more than just development. Since the Unity debacle we’ve seen some developers even say openly that costs of promotion and support dwarf costs of development.

You know when you’re in the Grymforge and you look across the chasm to see a bunch of Shar statues, waterfalls, and lava? I wonder if that’s the area.

Try under water.

It’s pretty awful that people like Phil define themselves by the ruin they can inflict on society.

Yes, they are used, but typically in specialized applications which is why you don’t see them every day.

When the effort to maintain the automation outstrips the benefit. This can happen often in dynamic environments with many moving parts.

His behaviour in this instance is indicative of a pattern of abuse and corruption. That’s why there’s this much outrage. You just don’t know what everyone else does.

deleted by creator

According to my kids, it matters not at all because it’s going to get spilled anyway.

Just saw Across the Spider-Verse. That movie is so beautiful. You can literally pause on any frame and you’re looking at an artistic masterpiece.

I watched it on a large OLED in 4k HDR, so ymmv. While it takes a really high place, my favourite is still PREDATOR; just an awesome script.

Game is good. People like to talk about stuff they like.