• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • That’s… the point? Civilizations with that kind of tendency may very well destroy their planet and/or themselves long before they advance to the point where they are detectable to an outside observer many light years away.

    The human race is at the moment in a race against time. We’re hoping that we can develop new technology to save ourselves faster than we destroy everything around us. This kind of race has probably happened countless times across the vast universe and perhaps the laws of physics ultimately make the race unwinnable. These laws limit how much technology can do for any species, no matter how smart, so it would be a universal filter.

    If the only way to win the race is to slow down the destruction of the environment to the point that the species is undetectable, that solves the Fermi paradox.








  • Which one is important is going to depend on the context for sure.

    If it’s an open source library, they probably won’t care about 1.

    If you’re working on internal software used by other developers within the company, management probably really does care about 1 because it’s going to impact their timelines.

    If you’re working on a proprietary user-facing API, then even if it doesn’t cost your company anything management might still care because it could piss off valuable customers.

    I think that, for what ever decision OP is trying to make, looking at that context is more important than quibbling over what exactly constitutes a “breaking change.”