• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • Schon, das war der Grund, warum man dachte, der Antrag käme von der CSU. Wenn man nun davon ausgeht, dass sie den Antrag zumindest grob gelesen haben, sagt man damit aber auch aus, dass man nicht dafür gestimmt hätte, wenn man gemerkt hätte, dass er von der AfD kommt, selbst wenn man mit dem Inhalt ja scheinbar konform geht.

    Man hat also nur dafür gestimmt, weil man den Antragsteller überlesen hat.
    Und das finde ich nicht gut, da man auch als Mitglied einer Partei so abstimmen sollte, wie man selbst überzeugt ist, auch wenn das die Position einer anderen Partei ist.

    Dass vor allem die CSU nicht weit von der AfD weg ist, ist ja kein Geheimnis, aber dann sollte man in Abstimmungen eben auch nicht nur deshalb nicht für etwas stimmen, weil es von der AfD kommt.




  • and have your own community – AKA instance

    The distinction between communities and instances is often poorly displayed in many cases which adds to the general confusion I feel. For example, feedit.de describes itself as “Deutschsprachige(German-speaking) Lemmy Community” and their Logo also states “lemmy community”.
    But it’s not a community, it’s an instance. The “subreddits” inside that instance are the communities, so feddit itself shouldn’t be called community to avoid confusion.

    Edit: Of course there’s also more added confusion when we talk about the Fediverse as a whole, where users on /kbin use the terms magazines and articles instead of comunities and posts and they also have different names for likes and dislikes.



  • Well our mouths wouldn’t change just because they are no longer needed the way they were before.
    It would only change if there was a negative effect of having a mouth and teeth like we have now.

    You could say if we don’t need our teeth anymore, they might disappear over time, but that would only occur if having teeth lead to higher death rates and fewer children being born. But we’ve generally come so far with our technology that we’re not really that much dependend on the “survival of the fittest” rule anymore.

    If we didn’t need our teeth and let those people who have tooth decay die from infections instead of treating them with our modern technology, then very very slowly those who had a random mutation that leads to them not having teeth at all actually have a better survivability than those who have teeth. But as we treat them, they have the same chance of reproducing as everyone else.

    You could also argue that it’s better for survivability to have as few body parts on you as possible that you need to provide energy for and those parts that you have being most energy efficient. So it could be that we at least develop smaller mouths when it’s no longer a benefit of having a bigger jaw etc. But this also wouldn’t happen because there is no reason why someone would die of having to spend too much energy on their body nowadays.