Air only has so much resistance itself. High enough voltage and the closest path to ground is where the charge will go.
Just like with Lightning
Air only has so much resistance itself. High enough voltage and the closest path to ground is where the charge will go.
Just like with Lightning
Exactly… this printer is useful honey.
I can make parts for the printer, accessories for filament management for the printer.
Halloween decorations… once I get the printer back online when I have this mod finished.
Parts for another printer.
Mounts for the brooms… when more filament comes in since I used the last of it for the parts for the new printer.
Save 450 on a unique appliance part they’re not making anymore which now justifies the thousands I’ve spent on this thing.
Seriously though. It is a fun hobby and if you want to just print and make things and not tinker there are plenty of good options out there. Me? I like tinkering. It’s a blast.
If I don’t design and print something I could buy I might be tempted to do more mods for my printer.
Things like this give us… balance. Luckily I have a new project… building a Voron so it’s both something new AND printing printer parts.
I found this one online from last year
https://www.printables.com/model/356486-cat-scratcher-cardboard-cutter-v2
Rise… and Shine… for todayyyy… the skies are… clear
“HL3: Estonian Shores” confirmed
G-man: Hello. Misterrrr Newsman…
Anchor: Um, we’ve talked about this. You can call me Frank.
G-man: No…. I’ll be Frank… with you… our mutual employerrr is not very… satisfied… with yourrr…. performance
It has its strength. The downside to blender is it’s geometry based unlike Fusion and others that are parametric.
Where this shines, for example, is when you’re defining a circle with a given radius. If it’s 4mm in a cad program and you export to STL it will be polygon based. But you can adjust the density of the export and, if you need to, scale your cad up 200%, 300%, etc and export again. Always resulting in the closest approximation of that circule in the stl or export. This way you don’t lose any fidelity. Blender does have some great tools for interpolating points in a mesh so it’s not useless either.
The best analogy I can think of is raster and vector. Doubling the size of a vector doesn’t result in aliasing. But, likewise, doing a high quality image of something photorealistic is not great on vector.
I use Fusion for cad modeling. The parametric design workflow allows me to adjust measurements, etc and have them show downstream, etc. But if I’m going to import something that’s already an 3d model I’ll use blender and mesh mixer to cleanup the model first.
I’ve also used just blender when using game assets to pose a model before exporting to a mesh for use in a slicer. Since, again, it’s the tool for the job.
What a poor ending that was.
Somebody suggested a better ending which I like too. Having Archer flash out and quantum leap into a cowboy or something and go “oh boy”
Very cool. And gives me some ideas for Halloween costume lighting
It’s a link to Amazon digital product. Specifically Rick Astley “The Best Of Me” album with Never Gonna Give You Up.
The “description” of the product doesn’t matter as long as the product code is the same.
https://www.amazon.com/Whatever-You-Want-Here/dp/B07X66DCLM
A trick I saw used a couple times on Reddit a few years back
It was a webcomic that took itself too seriously and it was so panned that the mockery of it reverberates even today.
May not be for everybody but it was definitely something to experience at the time. Sometimes the internet has these weird flashes of communal focus (which can be both good and bad) but either way these allusions are all of us nudging each others side with our elbow and winking at the same inside joke when we see it.
It’s not funny on its own. It’s funny because it’s an inside joke we all share.
The community mockery and allusion to the original is what makes the entire phenomenon.
Kind of like this pop up book on Amazon is a “isthisloss” in 3d.
https://www.amazon.com/Is-This-Art---4-Panel-Popup/dp/B07X66DCLM
It’s clever because it’s unexpected even if we all know what it is
It just showed up, I’ve updated it and the issue is resolved.
Thank you!
I’ll check it as soon as it shows in my region. Thank you again
It is ios18.
I should have noted that and to be honest I should have associated the iOS update along with the app data.
Thanks Eric
That Q is a real B
Tnut should do the trick. If not you could use the same bolt all the way through for the tensioner but that might be a pain to line up right.
I think you misunderstand.
Here’s an example. It has the math but doesn’t require that you “know” how to work the formulas or equations.
Because he’s doesn’t require that you know the math. He shows it, explains it, and visualizes the concept.
Quantum Mechanics 1b - Birth of the Quantum II
I can’t remember which video it was but in one he explains about how Einstein was shown that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was related to relativity in a series of letters. At which point Einstein conceded the point.
All this was done showing the equation… and then shifting the pieces around and explaining what they were. Until at the end what was left… was e=mc^2.
Edit: It was this video but I misremembered. It uses Einsteins equations to prove the uncertainty principle
Quantum Mechanics 3b - Probability and Uncertainty II
My point isn’t that the math isn’t there. It’s just that you’re not dropped into a video with here’s a formula… solve it and you’ll see why XYZ is true. The equations themselves are explained, visualized, etc.
If there’s a concept such as bell curves he shows that without requiring you do the numbers by showing how random motion will lead to certain probabilities over others.
Check this out
Quantum Mechanics 1a - Birth of the Quantum I
And then compare to this next episode in the series
Quantum Mechanics 1b - Birth of the Quantum II
And this later one. Where he gets more and more into the mathematics. But you’re not just thrown into the deepend at the start
If a person is at the intro/intermediate level that advice may be sound enough. Since they’re less likely to apply proper rules to include those ranges of IP’s etc.
Assuming it’s advising disabling it at the router/switch level and not just a per device level.
Better would be to explain: Disable this until you’re familiar with the following concepts (see cited books/material for more info)