MinekPo1 [She/Her]

lmao the “high priority bug” is just a user error

Honestly I feel like PHP regex may be able to parse html but not entirely sure

I pretty much grew up on Ubuntu’s default polish layout - a modified version of the polish programmer’s keyboard , which itself is a modified version of ANSI

(the preview is slightly broken , but oh well)

I cannot begin to stress how used I am t o having an extra key layer accessible by just pressing alt . Note that the current version I have has some dead keys as well on the third and fourth layer .

honestly I’ve been working on a side project in plain c , while I usually do c++ with a large amount of c libraries and I can’t say I prefer it . The OOP features c++ gives really feel absent and I really feel like my code could be cleaner with them .

especially as OP is comming from Java , c++ is likely a better option than c

don't get me started on ADHD 2.0

I mean from the few minutes I tried, I doubt it will work as I use spacial imagination as a substitute for visual imagination. Ie when a scene is described, I “feel” the things being described being there, but don’t see them.

From asking family members it seems like it runs in the family, so I don’t have much hope it will improve.

I am able to maintain 1-3 simple objects (so cuboids, spheres etc), though I find the euclideanity of this space to be quite fluid (ie impossible shapes, such as Klein’s bottle come naturally), though I can “feel” a few more objects, which can be more complex if I don’t focus to much on them.

As for visualising, I can also maintain simple geometry (& plotting simple functions), and I can let my mind “drift” letting it make random images which morph overtime and I cant focus on the details, or I can focus on trying to imagine something and I can feel like I’m looking at it, but don’t really see it, even less details.

When I let my mind drift I can vaguely control in which direction it moves (kinda like the control style in slider.io if that tells you anything) and I can vaguely steer it to morph into something but it morphs away soon after. It kinda feels like trying to morph a really viscus fluid, if that makes any sense?

How I experience aphantasia is as not being able to maintain an image. However I have good spacial imagination.

Something that can come up is weird notation in math.

As an example photomath, which is an automatic math problem solver, uses a different interval notation (ie x ≥ 2 is solved for all x ∈ [ 2, ∞ ⟩ ), than the one used in my locale (ie x ≥ 2 is solved for all x ∈ [ 2, ∞ ) or for all x ∈ ⟨ 2, ∞ )) which does trick some people up.

This is more relevant at highschool level than academic level I’m guessing though.

extra note: chat GPT gets the right notation (in a sample rate of n=1).

Like Github PRs on an open source project

Github is a git hosting service, PRs are an inherent feature of git, though done traditionally via email.

And if USB SS+ (aka USB 3.1 gen 2 aka USB 3.2 gen 2×1) with 10 Gb/s is not enough for you, the newest iteration of the USB standard USB 4.0 version 2.0 has USB4 gen 4 at 80 Gb/s

Edit: for reference: Wi-Fi 4 supports up to 600 Mb/s or .6 Gb/s, while Wi-Fi 7 supports up to 46.12 Gb/s

Apple didn’t even need to use USB C to do this bullshit:

The Lightning receptacle on the 12.9-inch iPad Pro (1st and 2nd generation) and 10.5-inch iPad Pro models has 16 pins, as there are additional eight pins on the other side. It supports USB 3.0 (now USB 3.2 Gen 1) at the maximum transfer speed of 5 Gbit/s.

- Wikipedia - Lightning (connector)

For reference USB 1.x/2.x A and B connectors have 4 or 5 pins, while USB 3.0+ A and B connectors have 9 or 10, with USB C having 24. USB 4.0 version 2.0 supports transfer speeds of up to 80 Gb/s. I think the 16 pin lighting connector could support USB 4.0, but this is just my speculation.

If I understand how USB Super Speed (ie USB 3.0+) works correctly, it is trivial to limit a USB C port to USB 2.0 modes, as it uses extra connections, which, I think, means you can just not connect them and treat the port like its a USB 1.x/2.x port. Not 100% sure tho

Honestly I only recently realized I don’t have a cable supporting USB Super Speed, though I detailed that in a different comment and I don’t want to repeat my self.

Tbh I doubt users would notice. If you have a USB cable near you, check if the USB A plug has a blue core, or you can count how many connections there are inside. If its not blue and has four connection (or five in the case of mini / micro versions), its USB 1.x/2.x. USB 3.0+ should be blue and has nine connections (except for USB C, which has 24). USB 1.x/2.x cables seem to be everywhere, at least where I live. And yes I’m saying 1.x/2.x because both use the same connectors and cables, with additions in 1.1 and 2.0 revised.

NAD noted that the price calculation underlying the challenged claim includes the cost of two set-top boxes per household for “standalone cable” services," but argued that such a comparison isn’t a good fit because operators such as Charter offer pay-TV streaming options that may not require a set-top box

"In the context of the ‘cable’ comparison, NAD found the claim reasonably conveys the cost of YouTube TV is compared to all cable services

NAD added that the dynamics of today’s pay-TV market also make it difficult to identify “comparable” offerings, noting that cable operators offer services such as regional sports networks in some markets and YouTube TV does not.

Google told NAD that it “unequivocally disagrees” with the decision and that it will appeal it. Google argued that "consumers broadly understand the difference between traditional cable and streaming

I have, through a mixture of ad blockers, privacy friendly 3rd party front ends, choice of services and living in a city which banned billboard ads, pretty much stopped seeing ads. And I observed I feel annoyance, when I do bump into an ad.

Honestly I felt kinda similarly to you when it comes to Java and Microsoft Java aka C#, but I found I was able to code in it with not that much struggle.

Not sure if you know python, but I feel like objects in C# are similar to python objects. You have to use the new keyword when you initialize a object though for some reason. Also PascalCase is used everywhere for some reason.

One of the largest gotchas for me was the char type being unsigned.

I found Microsofts docs to be quite easy to work with honestly.

You see, according to the USB specification…

Wait till you hear the third largest party in Poland is antisemitic