Limitless_screaming

Fedora uses it by default on KDE Plasma and Gnome. It even removed Xorg support for Gnome (and maybe Plasma. Can’t remember). Ubuntu uses it by default with Gnome. Any distro which leaves the DEs on their default settings gets Plasma and Gnome running Wayland by default.

Fact: 90% of gambling addicts quit right before they’re about to hit it big

are you really bitching about informed people providing you sound advise on how to solve your issue? wow.

“I really wish Windows would let me do this one specific thing”

“Have you tried switching out your OS for a completely different one with its own set of limitations and work flows”

Sound advice!

Snap sucks, but not for the reason OP stated. There’s a decillion reasons for why Snaps suck, why make up a reason that applies to other formats that are actually good?

Gamescope is just a Wayland compositor. It’s like switching from Gnome to Plasma (or Mutter to KWin), I don’t think that would matter to Steam.

Does Steam even have any support for Wayland? There’s maybe one dialogue window that runs under native Wayland, and the rest of the UI uses XWayland. I’ve been running the few games I played under XWayland and they work just fine on KDE Plasma / Manjaro.

That’s if you were able to pose a threat, in which case it would be less compelling to take your food, and the whole thing might not happen.

Oh, right. It should have been -4. Thanks.

Mine have it too, but it doesn’t change the results.

I was taught that negative numbers should be written as (-2) with the parentheses when using exponents. So I assume that the calculators are doing it right, or maybe it’s just a measure against calculators doing it wrong? I cannot be sure. Also-2 = 0-2 so -2^2 = 0-2^2.

No, you’d expect that -2^2 would equal 4, but calculators solve it as -(2)^2 not (-2)^2. But the case you mentioned is also pretty common.

I don’t think you encounter this one very often, but the technically correct -2^2 = -4 has a higher chance of ruining your day.

My Casio calculators get this wrong, even the newer ones. BTW the correct answer is 16, right?

If you actually want a reason, then most people experience faster boot up times using runit instead of Systemd. I haven’t tried it yet though.

I was just trying to make fun of how hard it is to replace Systemd. I am still gonna make the switch when I get some free time.

Honestly I don’t know. I just know that desktop environments and a lot of other packages have hard dependencies on Systemd, at least on Arch and Debian based systems. Those packages include: base, flatpak, polkit, xdg-desktop-portals, and vulkan-intel. So yeah, it’s nearly impossible to not break anything.

If you try to switch a distro that’s already using Systemd to some other init system, you’ll have so many broken things to fix!

That’s if I even realize that it’s a dream. I rarely get dreams, and when it happens I just cannot tell, no matter how wacky it gets.

The one time it happened, I just decided to walk into a mirror that wasn’t showing anything.

Under extreme circumstances too. A place you have never seen, while your running is slower than your real life walking, your punches barely do anything, and If you fall from your height, then it’s game over. Also color? what’s that?

Dude, if I ever saw someone slowly tearing you from limb to limb I wouldn’t even move my toes. I may even start making justifications for them.