Exactly this. One major reason I’m on here is that SDF lets me choose for myself what I wanna see and what I don’t.
Also mir sind in Bayern jetzt schon mehrere Menschen begegnet die das nicht kennen.
Osterfeuer vielleicht
Lasst das bloß nicht die “leben und leben lassen”-Partei erfahren, sonst verbieten die bald das Bier
Also ich wähl die AfD nicht, aber wenn mich was dazu bewegen könnte, dann der Appell eines Milliardärs es nicht zu tun.
Nah, I’m vegan, and eating meat shaped like an animal is like eating two animals at once.
The title says “There’s more people who wake up at the same second than people who fall asleep at the same second”. One could (and most people seem to) interpret this as “the maximum amount of people waking up at any given second is higher than the maximum amount of people falling asleep at any given second”, which is a statement I agree with. I interpreted it as “The amount of people waking up at any given time is higher than the amount of people falling asleep at the same time”, which is of course false.
It seems we just weren’t talking about the same thing. You were talking about the maximum values of both distributions, for which the statement is true, while I only considered the distributions’ median and mean values, for which the statement isn’t true.
I disagree that the post makes clear OP is referring to the max values, but I guess that’s because english is not my first language, and my statistics background likely made me over analyze the statement.
Of course there are moments where more people awake at the same time than fall asleep at the same time. In the second 07:00:00 , yeah, more people awake than fall asleep. The same isn’t true for 22:13:35. And if you look at all seconds of the day you will find that on average, each second the amount of people that fall asleep is roughly equal to the amount of people waking up.
What you are talking about is variance. There is a higher variance in the times of people falling asleep than there is in the times of people waking up. That does not mean that “more people wake up at the same time than fall asleep”. There are times of the day when significantly more people wake up than fall asleep, but as a counterweight, on prettey much all other times, the amount of people falling asleep is slightly higher than the amount of people waking up.
So actually, it’s the reverse. Given that most people wake up to alarm clocks, if you pick a random time of the day, it is likely that in that second more people fall asleep than wake up
I don’t see why that would be true. People generally fall asleep about as often as they wake up, so the number of people who fall asleep at the same time and the number of people who wake up at the same time, averaged over all moments of a day, should be pretty much equal.
I am sorry about your experiences, and I agree that your condition puts you at a disadvantage.
But I disagree that neurotypical students have a privilege in this regard. What you are describing is an issue you will be facing everywhere, not just at university. Being able to socialize is a valuable skill in almost every setting, because humans are social animals, and many things in society revolve around personal relationships. Much of your later career will depend on who you know, and how much your (potential) bosses like you.
We should try to make things more accessible, but ultimately what puts you at a disadvantage isn’t so much a rigged system, as your condition itself.
To draw a parallel: Blind people are at an extreme disadvantage, and we should try to make things as accessible to them as we can. But in the end humans are visual beings, many things in society will naturally revolve around sight. A society in which blind people are at no disadvantage whatsoever is just not feasable, because in the end they just have one ability less than everyone else.
Or another, more personal one: I suffer from migraines. Each month I spend 2-4 days in bed in pain and vomitting. It would be nice if that didn’t put me at a disadvantage, but I don’t see how that would work. I too believe that I “deserved a better experience”, but the fault lies with my condition, not people not accomodating for it enough.
Your comment sure showed me! Right?..
Yeah, that’s gonna show those nazis! Right?..
That’s an advantage, not a privilege. Being good at something isn’t the same as having special rights. For any given skill there will always be people who are good at it and others who aren’t.
There are also fields where people with an ASD seem to have an advantage over neurotypicals. For example, the STEM major rate for young adults with an ASD is significantly higher than that of the general population, as this paper found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-012-1700-z
Wenn Du ganz lieb bei ner Tankstelle fragst lassen die dich vielleicht eine benutzen.
Of all the shit Ubisoft does, not selling on steam is the dealbreaker? Alright.
I really enjoyed Watch_Dogs, despite the shit it got at the time.
Warum wird eigentlich ständig mit dem Begriff “Extremismus” um sich geworfen? Weder bei der letzte Generation, noch bei protestierende Bauern gibt es Probleme mit Extremismus. RAF und NSU, das waren Extremisten. Menschen die bereit sind für ihre Sache andere Menschen körperlich (oder auch seelisch) zu verletzen. Die Straßen zu blockieren hat damit nichts zu tun.
The people complaining about that are mostly the same as the ones who complained that the masks were “suffocating” them during covid.