- 1 Post
- 231 Comments
48·3 days agoThere’s no such thing as being too based.
IP law is an illegitimate institution, so no they’re absolutely not.
Do everyone a favor and consider your position more carefully. Particularly, consider the difference between an individual woman deciding what to do with her body and an entire movement asking for a large number of women to do (or not do) something with their body.
Wife.
2·11 days agoFair.
||The Devils hands are idle playthings|| Honestly, this is probably the easiest one to guess.
2·27 days agoA shame, you seemed an honest ma~~n.
はい、そうです。
3·1 month agoYeah, I was getting the names mixed up.
The pokemon leak. I think it was originally uploaded to this website.
Is it because of the leak?
22·1 month agoThat’s about once every 10 days. Are you okay, op?
Maximum Poggers.
People forgetting about “&.”
0·2 months agoTYVM!
I have an idea for a project that requires a suppliment to my utterly inadequate creative writing skills, and I have had abysmal luck finding a co-author. I don’t want to use the LLMs available online because I have learned not to rely on a tool that’s could disappear without notice. The part about it being potentially illegal was a joke and nothing more.
Have you considered that you can’t tell what someone does or doesn’t understand by a comment?
That’s entirely fair. I’m annoyed today, and the reply about the wrench just made it worse. My apologies.
I think you’re missing the subtle distinction between “can” and “should.”
To answer your question, I have friends that find them entertaining, and at least one who uses them in projects to do stuff, but don’t know the details. Have you considered that something you don’t understand might not be useless and evil? Your personal ignorance says nothing about a subject.
Image for a second that I said you shouldn’t pull teeth with a wrench.
Your response would’ve been equally appropriate.
You understand that arguments about the legitimacy of law is an argument about whether a law should exist rather than if a law does exist, right?
There’s a difference between saying that someone’s “in the right” (which they’re absolutely not) and saying someone is legally capable of doing what they want. (which is debatable)