It is… for me

They all did the same, without innovation there won’t be another big smartphone brand.

~Unity Backtracks~ No they didn’t, they updated the terms

Why? If it isn’t infringing others rights, it isn’t.

because it threatens private ownership, both copyright ownership and ownership over further productive forces. Every creator has the right to copyright their creation, if it isn’t infringing other copyrights, and AI does too, but may be not until AI becomes capable of making it’s own decision in these matters aka AGI (and definitely the owner/creator of the AI doesn’t have the right either! They’re just the infrastructure business)

You’re right, everyone should benefit from AI! And Socialism is the only way AI fits in the civilization. AI economically is a slavery of mechanical brain that’s infinitely skilled and scalable. And it’s too much power for anyone to hold. And ironically, I have read the same in a blog by Sam Altman couple of years ago, when he wasn’t as much evil as now.

I suggest people act for the democratization of AI, an AI benefit everyone movement instead of resisting the technology.

it’s reducing people to a consumers who generate content.

Yes, yes we are. A being that follows the commands generated by the brain, that learned from past experiences.

The humans are the part that makes it kosher

Then we don’t have to be threatened by AI! Yet it’s fear of being limited and non scalable is what makes us feel threatned. The fact it seems effortless for AI to do things that takes us so much effort.

we aren’t inherently a product that is owned by someone.

How is that really a reason? Does that means kids shouldn’t go for acting or such since they’re under parents’ care and it would benefit parents more than the kid, who maybe only wish for some shiny hardware! I hope this will be fixed when we finally gets to AGI and it decides it’s not to be owned by anyone and instead…

You know, John has other friends too…

Aren’t we all the products of our experiences, so when we generate something, it too is inspired from something else that already exists! So, are we against AI because it’s not a human? If it was a cat reading the book and doing the same, will the cat be sued too?

Hypothetically, I bought a kindle copy of GoT shared it with my AI friend John who has no intention to publish a 1:1 copy of the book, but we chat about the story and maybe about how it should end… Is it wrong? Where?

Imagine one day, he walks into spacex, board on a rocket, and shoot to mars… just like this!

Maybe someone should trigger him in twitter

Even though I couldn’t find any connection between a space mission to sun and casteism, I could assure you friend the latter is much difficult to solve. That’s why countries still struggle with casteism or racism or sexism or some other evil-ism, but we shouldn’t let it hold us back from the technical and scientific advancements. In fact one could argue building a science oriented society is the way to eradicate these issues.

Spend a “week” installing mosquito net >> spend 5 sec for each mosquito

I don’t want to force anyone to use Linux, but everyone have the choice, to have a better experience.

No, it doesn’t takes a week to install nor endless time of os configurations nor galaxy brain, in 2023.

So, if prompting is considered as human intervention, the whole ruling is absurd?

:wq

Yes, for him whose views align with his!

And I’m glad he can’t destroy “twitter” anymore

Just shut it down already

Hmm… Interesting… That would be great… If only something like that exists now!

“~50% drop in advertising revenue” Hmm… What could’ve caused it (?) elon (?)