• Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Our election system mathematically guarantees there will be only two useful choices. Any attempt to swap one of those out requires years of transition in which you are actively helping the side who agrees with you even less to win and move you further away from what you want.

        Until we have more ubiquitous ranked-choice-esque systems, that will not change.

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yes, but this has to be done in a more local level. Trying to force a new party into existence starting at the federal level is not planning for success

            • atro_city@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Exactly, from the bottom up. Local candidates are probably the only ones you have a real chance of meeting and engaging with more often.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      If only Kamala had won, then the Biden administration wouldn’t be doing this

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    That might be a good thing, because making a terrorism charge stick is going to be should in a just world be really really difficult.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    As a person who grew up in American schools post-Columbine, with kids in schools now, and none of us are CEOs, this is probably the take that saddens me most about this whole event. It’s our kids, and the argument used to be about freedom. Soon, we won’t even have that. What was the fucking point? (Rhetorical: profit)

    I know we’re all alive at a special time in humanity. We think we’re so civilized. Then I look around, and it’s the same history playing on repeat. When do the monkeys figure out it’s one species? (Rhetorical again: 😬)

  • IronJess@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is because the Government with Republicans and Neo Liberals are about business interests over the American people. People need to just start sharing their denials from United healthcare every time they right a piece how Luigi is evil. So tired of this bullshit. And here is another thought pro lifers need to start protesting for universal healthcare to be consistent.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      They’ll make it illegal to share “sensitive information” like healthcare insurance denials, and they’ll punish you for releasing your own sensitive information.

      And then they’ll go after anyone reposting it for violating your rights, they’ll charge them on your behalf regardless of whether you protest that you don’t want to charge them.

      They’ll violate you in weird ways.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Unfortunately, the people doing it are the media It’s a quintessential “man bites dog” story. Normally it’s the insurance companies killing civilians. Everyone is going to cover it. The police had a manhunt because it would look ridiculous if they didn’t solve such a high-profile case.

    It’s kind of a symbiotic relationship, the media covers it, the police react harshly, the media covers it more.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      You know what looks even more ridiculous? Only taking action on anything when the victims are wealthy. Go read about how ridiculously lax NYC laws against crime are. But some rich dude gets shot and all of the sudden the cops are Columbo, and the court prosecutors are Matlock (yes I’m aware how old those references make me seem).

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    What a shocking surprise. Why stop there? Why not charge him with genocide? Bring him to The Hague and charge him with war crimes?

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    They want to make Luigi an example. “Don’t do what he did, he’s being quickly processed with terrorism added to the charges. You don’t wanna be a terrorist do you?”

    • hexadence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      The complete lack of understanding someone who is pushed into a corner and has nothing to lose. Someone who expects the worst anyway.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      … and in other news: Insurance CEOs are some of the best human beings walking on this Earth! Just this morning, one of them gave $50 to a homeless person who lost everything paying a hospital bill. What a golden heart!

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          One can be pro-gun and for regulation at the same time.

          Disarm the violent, arm the nonviolent. For life.

          If you so much as strike another person in anger, instantly banned for life.

          Luigi was a non-violent person, he didn’t do what he did to watch a man’s head explode. He did what he had to do

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Mental illness like forcing your employees back into the office when they did the job remotely just fine for two years

      • 4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Gun was printed. Do you realize that there is no stopping 3D printed guns now?

        I’ve been in the community for many years, reluctantly due to their right wing tendencies. People are making 50 cal sniper rifles, 38 mm grenade launchers, and fully automatic submachine guns.

        My little AR pistol runs at 10 rounds per second. Legally

        All at home.

        The Glock used by Luigi is an old design. He just made the most reliable one (ignoring the silencer issues)

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      You know that the gun was printed right? You could ban all guns and you would never stop someone from making a homemade gun.

      There are people in European countries where it’s completely illegal to even own ammunition, they are perfectly able to make fully automatic rifles.

      I don’t say any of this as a bad thing btw

      Unless there is a plan to strip violent people of firearms, I’m going to continue to make my own and train twice as much as they do.

      ARM THE LEFT

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      funny how murikans are Super against gun violence all of a sudden when it happened to a rich white male… but not so much when its a class full of poor kids

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I mean, terrorism is just politically motivated violence.

    This country was founded by terrorists.

  • dogsoahC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    It pretty neatly fits the definition of (individual) terrorism (which doesn’t really exist). It was an act of violence, not based on personal grievance with the direct victim, but based on grievance with the system he represented. But, yeah, they probably wouldn’t ever pull that when someone gets murdered for racist reasons, which you could also classify as terrorism.

    🎶 Because it’s about class and not about justice. 🎶

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      For what it’s worth, we do have hate crime laws that are supposed to be used in cases where racism is at play. I’m not saying it’s always used, but we do have additional penalties for it.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I love how they media seems shocked whenever they find Americans who have been radicalized, when one of their counterparts have been radicalized Americans for the last handful of decades.

    • HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s on purpose - by acting shocked they expect viewers to react the same way. It’s essentially telling their audience how to feel about the story without outright saying “you should feel like this”.

      • Qwazpoi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The same way the laugh track in sitcoms ques the audience to know that something was supposed to be funny. Try watching those shows without the laugh track and see how funny they feel or how often you laugh

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Rumor has it, if you say, “deny, defend, depose” in your phone 3 times, you’ll get charged with terrorism too. Hopefully you’re an American citizen or else it’s off to Guantanamo bay for you.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you say “Gitmo Bay” three times in the mirror, a dark universe Obama appears and snatches you.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The unconstitutional Patriot Act says they can do that to citizens too, as long as they’re suspected of terrorism. That’s why everything is “terrorism” these days, because under that accusation they’ll strip you of your constitutional rights and do whatever the fuck they want. It’s tyranny.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Still, as a person not interested (usually) in agreeing with my counterparts, notice how this is a “good guy with a gun” situation. So maybe militia movement has a point. They just don’t know how to use their correctness outside of their one part of society’s fabric, but that’s up to those who know those other parts. Cooperation and collaboration, all that.

        And almost any “good guy with a gun” can be called a terrorist formally. It’s an arbitrary separation.

        So maybe gun rights really are human rights.

        You’ve probably noticed how in any group the best decisions are made when every opinion is respected, and if it’s incomprehensible, made comprehensible with good and kind effort, and where aggression and expulsion are minimized.

        It’s the same in politics.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yes, my aunts, uncle and cousin live in a country reproducing “Animal farm” the last 6 years, with the end goal of being occupied and turned into a reservation. That book is more like reality than many would think.