I’m not even sure how many chickens I can fit on my current hard drive, but it’s probably more than the number of persons I can fit.
Personally, I measure capacity in Tera-dactyls.
Since dactyl mean finger, which can also be translated as a digit, it kinda works. 🤔
Nice.
Which language has a word/abbreviation that can translate as either chicken or something to do with data storage?
I don’t understand your question. You don’t use chickens as a measurement of file size?
Next you’ll tell me you don’t describe a gigachicken as a person!
Only if plucked.
Plato in shambles
There’s a huge difference between chicken^4 vs chickens^4. Approximately (✓chick/4)π
Maybe after a bunch of translations you could get there
That’s what you need to sacrifice to the demon lord’s of the Bit to get a drive
I would filter by 1 chicken just to see what comes up
Weirdly, it was just a hard drive. I took this screenshot 1-2 months ago and the filter options aren’t quite the same today, but “1 chickens” still shows up as option. If I select it, I get: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Universal-500G-USB3-0-External-Hard-Disc-HDD-State-Drive-Notebook-Desktop-for-Flash-Deals-Women-Men-New-Blue/9815853058
Probably 1 chicken
Try a different store, they probably have a 1 PetaPerson drive.
A PetaPerson would hold 0 chickens.
Chickens are a bad file system to use anyway, they can get plucked too easily and fail.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see chickenfs next time I format a drive. It would probably pair well with butterfs.
I don’t know why but chickenfs sounds like a new trend on pornhub.
You must be thinking of step-chickenfs.
I hear butterfs even runs on a potato.
From personal experience, you will only be able to fit one chicken into your network, but you will end up with at least two, possibly more.
If you refuse to buy said chickens, one or more will arrive on their own
So, you might as well just default to three and hope that’s the end of it.
The good news is that chickens very much enjoy the warmth of a humming PC, and will gladly lay eggs there.
That last part is not a joke.
Is chicken-networking related to duck-networking as described in The Story about Ping?
There’s some overlap there for sure.
Problem is that the ducks are quackers, and the chickens are giant peckers, along with being some serious mothercluckers when you take the eggs off of the pc.
Just today I was trying to look for something at homedepot and not only were the filters exactly like that, but they were also additive. So if I selected both “1 chicken” and “1 chickens” to cover both spellings, it would say 0 results because no product matches both at the same time.
This shit infuriates me. It is trivial to add an option for “and/or” when you have multiple checkboxes.
You don’t even really need an option for fields that are single value and compared by equality. Two distinct values for that only ever make sense as an OR filter.
I haven’t had this problem that I can recall with online shopping, but I have definitely encountered it when searching Jira tickets.
Actually, some of my most successful online shopping (or at least filtering) has been at Home Depot. They indicate where items are in their store very specifically (and usually accurately) and most of them even have Google Maps of the inside of their store. Because I can precisely locate something before I go there, I know exactly where to go when I do and can be in and out very quickly. It’s wonderful.
The screenshot is from Walmart. Their accuracy is much more questionable. I didn’t see a single chicken last time I visited. Joking aside, the website has indicated that an item was in stock in an aisle that didn’t even exist (I think it was looking at another store despite me confirming multiple times which one I had set).
In Jira that counts as a feature because Jira is explicitly designed to be as painful as possible to work with.
That’s multiplicative, no? Conjunctive rather than disjunctive.
It sounds like it’s set up as an AND search, rather than the OR that any normal person would expect here.
Yeah, that’s what I mean with conjunctive instead of disjunctive.
Yo, give me the hard drive that fits another bard drive. I’ll load a hard drive onto the hard drive in my hard drive so I can load a hard drive on it.
Jo dawg
I heard you like hard drives …
What the cluck
It’s for the Chicken PDF, silly!
Hmm, that loads a blank page for me and searching online for “chicken PDF” returns a lot of unrelated stuff.
Still, I’ve heard a PDF can be the size of Britain or something like that. It makes sense that you could only fit a single one (or perhaps single ones) on your drive.
This is clearly more than one chicken.
My knowledge of grammar is insufficient to determine whether it is more than one chickens.
One chicken is equal to 1,024 Bacockobytes of data (more commonly known as simply a ‘bacock’)
Mine say 256 ertuherrrrs. Wut dat?
Sounds like you need to reformat and install KFC Linux - Kernel Saunders Edition.
I’m gonna upgrade to the 0 TB hard drive pretty soon so everything stops using up so much storage
Sigh. How many times do I have to keep telling people… 0TB ≠ 0 TiB. One is a marketing gimmick that makes it look like you’re getting more capacity than is actually available. You think you’re getting 0TB when you’re actually only getting 0TiB.
It can be ∞ TB if you inverse it by instead uploading to cloud 😏🤏🏻
are you saying all I need to do is reverse the polarity?
“Hm… 1 chicken or 1 chickens… 🤔”
Hold up. There are six 1 chickens? I gotta see what a 1 chickens capacity drive looks like.
The six 1 chickens are for RAID
Redundant Avians In Drive?
The filters are different today and only one result shows up, but apparently this is a 1 chickens drive: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Universal-500G-USB3-0-External-Hard-Disc-HDD-State-Drive-Notebook-Desktop-for-Flash-Deals-Women-Men-New-Blue/9815853058
If you’re curious enough to reproduce the results yourself, obviously it’s Walmart (I’m not proud, but they’re the only store within an hour of my small town that carries essentially any electronics at all). I got the results searching for “20tb external drive” (not carried, it turns out) and trying to filter by capacity and in-store, but I imagine you could perform a less specific search and perhaps get even more amusing filters.
Everytime an item gets a search optimized name, an angel gets its One Size Fits All Wing Wings Bird Men Women White Feathers All Ages New.
1 Chicken is measured by the cut size. The smallest currently is measured in bites. Here is a 3lb partition…
Do they come in terabites?
Cubes?! Well I’ll be darn, we got solid-state chicken now.
Wut.
Guaranteed source of iodine? Mmmm
strictly speaking, if you mix salt in some oil, you have an essential oil.
I think a cube is equivalent to a byte
No, a cube is clearly slang for a qubit or quantum bit so we are dealing with storage for a quantum computer.
Now chicken has ribs? Did they grow up in 3 mile Island?
Yeah, you definitely don’t want to get one that only holds 1 chicken. The extra money is worth it to hold 1 chickens.
How many chickens can the 0 TB drive store, I wonder?
No no, that’s 0 Tuberculosis.
what a gift from the universe.
(mostly commenting so that I find this again in the future :-)
